For the sake of simplicity your 512MB cache will now be called RAM: But from my (professional) experience, it's very hard to notice any improvement except for specific situations (which I haven't found yet really ).Ĭlick to expand.Yeah because you were writing 4.5GB to a disk with only 512Mb of cache. I'm just kidding, I'm very interested about this topic. Please show us a screenshot of a 10GB copying action over those drives at 99% completion When you copy a very large file from G- to C-drive, at what speed does the action end? The file still needs to be copied to the slower HDD, so I reckon the speed rate will fall dramatically at the end of the copying action (or at shutdown or other checkpoints). In the background probably.Ībout the writes. Shutdows will be slower as the data has to be written to the HDD and startups will be slower due to starting caching the data from the disk. PrimoCache probably does the same thing by software in RAM. A 40GB SSD cache drive using Intel Smart Response Technology will cache the most accessed data 'more permanently' (but a lot slower). But the improved reads will only shine when the data to be fetched has been cached already.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |